'Media Violence and Children Essay\r'

'Your children atomic number 18 surrounded by wildness. From tv games and television to the news itself, bloodshed is e precisewhere. Many parents and educators veneration that military group seen on the media will at the very least(prenominal) desensitize children, and that it whitethorn level use up children more likely to commit atrocities themselves. Other heap claim the military group seen on the media is non hearty, and that children run across this. So who’s right? In revision to better understand this crucial issue, we postulate to turn out the history of force play in entertain custodyt as well as revelations made possible by new science.\r\nViolence in entertainwork forcet is not new. Even in ancient Rome, people self-contained to abide by gladiators. In gladiator combats, two adroit men (usually criminals or slaves) would fight each variant in front of a cheering crowd. Some cadences, men would also be forced to fight rampantly animals. These shows were incredibly popular; in order to declare the huge masses of people eager to watch the combat, Roman officials built the Colosseum, which could seat 50,000 spectators, in 80 CE. The opening of the Colosseum was celebrated with 100 days of games, during which thousands of men and animals were seriously injured or killed.\r\nLong forwards children watched slam-bang cartoons, they listened to savage stories. Even our most valued fairy humbugs often contain bloodshed. In fact, modern versions of fairy tales tend to be a roofy less unwarranted than the originals. For example, in Hans Christen Anderson’s The Little Mermaid, the little mermaid has her tongue cut out, around stabs her prince, and dies; Disney’s famous version of this classic tale is signifi nookietly happier and less slam-bang. But why is violence such a popular form of enjoyment? There are several possible answers, and they are probably all true to nearly extent.\r\n populate like watchi ng violence because it is, at least to some degree, forbidden; all functioning societies need to stir laws against murder. Seeing other people’s pain also makes your own problems seem insignificant. Finally, some violence in the media was beggarlyt to teach a hard-nosed lesson. Many gladiators were condemned criminals, so their violent and entertaining stopping point served as a warning against would-be criminals. ordinary executions take served the like purpose throughout history. king tales also warned children against the dangers of misbehaving.\r\nFor example, the little mermaid disobeyed the rules of her father and her people, and she suffered as a result. Modern violence in the media is not that different from what occurred in the past. People enjoy watching violence because it is forbidden, distracting, and it can teach lessons about palpableity. At the same time, violence is becoming more and more prevalent. Additionally, more of the violence shown in telly games, movies, and television is whole unrealistic; real consequences are very seldom shown, especially in cartoons.\r\nAs a result, the violence may be too glamorized to teach real life lessons. Even if violence does teach a morality lesson, children may still be negatively affected. Vincent P. Mathews, a professor of radiology at inch University School of Medicine, discovered that watching violence on the media might in truth alter brain function. utilitarian magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed that watching violent images decreased frontlet lobe brain activity in children whether or not they had previous problems of aggression. Decreased frontal lobe activity is associated with attention and self control problems.\r\n as well using fMRI, Klaus Mathiak at the University of Aachen in Germany discovered that contend violent video games and thinking about actually participating in real violent activities urinate the same part of the brain. In other words, an item-by-itemâ €™s brain cannot distinguish between violent actions that are committed by the individual and violent activities that are purely make believe. Additionally, violent video games may be training the brain for real life violent behavior. So what does all of this mean for parents?\r\nChildren, like adults, are naturally drawn to violent images, and it is possible for children to learn valuable lessons from violent stories. However, video to too much violence, especially glamorized violence, probably does have a negative impact of children. Although more scientific research needs to be conducted before decisive answers can be given, children may have a hard time distinguishing between real violence and fake violence, and simply watching violence may lead to increased behavioral problems. If you are upset(a) that your children are watching too much violence, you should reminder exactly what they are watching.\r\nMovies and video games both have rating systems, and all televisions 13 inches or bigger that were manufactured in the United States since January 2000 contain V chips. V chips allow parents to control what programs are watched, even when the children are unsupervised. You could also limit the amount of time that your children are allowed to spend watching television or playing video games, regardless of whether or not the programs or games contain violent content. Finally, you can dispute the reality of violence with you children to make sure that they can differentiate between make believe and reality.\r\n'