John Deweys Critique of Socioeconomic Individualism Essay -- Sociolog

My newspaper attempts to exhibit the consistency of John Deweys non-individualistic individualism. It details Deweys arrogate that the traditional dualism opposing the individual to the social is politically debilitating. We find Dewey in the 20s and 30s, for example, arguing that the creation of a authentic creation arena, iodin capable of precluding the rise of an artificial chasm between sociality and personal identityor, rather, one capable of precluding the rise of an artificial chasm between notions of sociality and individualityhad itself been forestalled by an inherited, outdated, but nonetheless dominant custom called individualism. By blocking general investigation itself, by enervating what Dewey called social inquiry, and thus by misguiding historically sensitive assessments of slippery social phenomena, our contingently strapped individualism drifts aimlessly and destructively through the present era. Insofar as it fails to realize how publicity and individuality fundament be a congruous, inextricable, and mutually conditioning pair, individualism leeches many of straightaways individuals of their situated and situating historical potential. In the final chapter of his work The exoteric and its Problems (PAIP) John Dewey suggests that, despite the insistence of most social theorists, if we regard the questionable individual/social distinction as a gap to be bridged or as an antithesis to be synthesized then our nose for public & classless reform has been tricked by a central red herring of political currentityThe preliminary to fruitful discussion of social matters is that certain obstacles shall be overcome, obstacles residing in our present conceptions of the method of social inquiry. One of the obstructions in the alley is the seemingl... ...ical progress, and only then lead we lay the foundation for the construction of public apparati which do not merely police atomic selves negatively in their battles for economic supremacy an d which do not merely reconcile cabaret to the claims of private Selves but which produce selves habitually resistant to atomization.Indeed, as we similarly indicated above, according to Dewey the problem of publicity in modern society and the modern state lies less in need of bridging the gap between the one and the many as in showing the impractical effects of thinking according to the conceptual scheme of a gap. It is currently anathema, in separate words, to think sacrificially of publicity, to think that a lively public arena flock exist only when certain individual claims are sacrificed or, conversely, that individuality will thrive only at the expense of the greater public good.